What It Shows
Constrovet organizes project records into cited risk questions for lenders, investors, and boards. It shows cost leakage, overruns, delay impact, ESG gaps, recovery visibility, and missing evidence.
Why It Matters
Financiers often receive summaries without source evidence. Clear citations make it easier to ask the right questions before funding or monitoring decisions.
What Executives Get
- Cost, leakage, delay, ESG, and recovery findings.
- Separates baseline budget from leakage and overrun indicators.
- Missing evidence to request before decisions.
- Cited questions for financier and advisor review.
- 7/30/90 recovery action visibility for monitored projects.
What Documents Help
- Project budgets, BOQs, actual spend records, contracts, and payment records.
- Progress reports, schedule updates, delay notes, and procurement logs.
- ESG, fuel, water, energy, waste, and carbon records where available.
- Existing lender reports, board packs, risk notes, and project correspondence.
Example Output
| Risk area | Evidence used | Financier output |
|---|---|---|
| Cost overrun | Budget, actual spend, BOQ | Difference, formula, citation, review question |
| Schedule delay | Baseline schedule, revised schedule, progress report | Delay days, cost evidence if available, action relevance |
| ESG evidence gap | Fuel, energy, water, waste records | Metric found or missing evidence to request |
Questions It Supports
- Which findings are baseline budget and which are leakage or overrun?
- Do Budget and Actual values support an Actual - Budget overrun calculation?
- Are ESG metrics evidenced, missing, or mixed into unrelated financial claims?
- Which 7/30/90-day actions should leadership review first?
When To Use It
Use it before funding, during monitoring, when delays trigger review, or when stakeholders need an evidence brief.
Action Use
Findings can support immediate information requests, 30-day monitoring actions, and 90-day governance review. They remain review prompts, not commercial conclusions.
A lender or insurer who sees only a narrative update, not cited findings, prices the project on uncertainty. Evidence submitted before it is requested is what moves a project from reactive audit to financeable record.